Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
567-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

567-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.972285 50.866461)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.972243 50.866456,-0.972245 50.866464,-0.972250 50.866472,-0.972260 50.866478,-0.972271 50.866482,-0.972285 50.866483,-0.972298 50.866482,-0.972310 50.866478,-0.972319 50.866473,-0.972326 50.866465,-0.972328 50.866457,-0.972326 50.866448,-0.972320 50.866441,-0.972311 50.866435,-0.972299 50.866431,-0.972286 50.866429,-0.972261 50.866434,-0.972251 50.866440,-0.972245 50.866448,-0.972243 50.866456)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL